collapse

Author Topic: TulipFX is back!  (Read 1601 times)

Offline iliosellas

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #15 on: January 06, 2017, 12:14:32 AM »

Offline TulipFX

  • Commercial Member
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • By traders, for traders.
    • TulipFX
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2017, 08:56:53 AM »
The issue is resolved, the account is verified again.
Tjalling

Offline alaali

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 19
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #17 on: January 07, 2017, 07:42:07 AM »
Planning to use Rocket on $3000 account.

Will let you know how it goes.

Offline alaali

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 19
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #18 on: January 10, 2017, 09:42:55 AM »
Up 4% on a $3000 account using the recommended risk and minimum recommended deposit in Day 1 of using Rocket EA.

Online McBain2109

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #19 on: January 10, 2017, 11:31:09 AM »
Yes, the 1st Day was great. Interesting, I have other baskets than you. But also more profit.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2017, 11:32:41 AM by McBain2109 »

Offline alaali

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 19
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #20 on: January 10, 2017, 12:31:39 PM »
Maybe we are using a different settings.

What is your trading hours parameter? for me I am using the default. +00:30,-6:00

Online McBain2109

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #21 on: January 10, 2017, 01:06:31 PM »
Im using default settings. Trading Hours: +00:30,-6:00
Whats your EA Version 1.4?

Offline alaali

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 19
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #22 on: January 10, 2017, 01:07:04 PM »
Yes 1.4.
Im using default settings. Trading Hours: +00:30,-6:00
Whats your EA Version 1.4?

Online McBain2109

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #23 on: January 10, 2017, 01:14:09 PM »
I think the different results are from different price feeds (IC Markets vs. Pepperstone), the 5M Chart is very noisy.
Nevertheless, for me Rocket is an impressive EA, we will see how it goes in the next weeks.


Online reinerh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1676
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #24 on: January 10, 2017, 04:59:52 PM »
i am curious, what is the recommended sl level in equity value with rocket ??

my guess dd 20 to 30 % or so.



Offline CanadianPsycho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 523
  • Free markets are sexy
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #25 on: January 11, 2017, 06:31:31 AM »
You can set your own stop loss as a percentage of your account equity in the inputs screen. It's a grid trading bot that will continue to open trades until the trade logic closes the basket in profit, or blows the account.

Really profitable EA, but you have to be very careful with it.

Online Trade It Easy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 641
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #26 on: January 11, 2017, 07:59:10 AM »
Alarm bells started ringing for me when I saw tulipfx hiding their open orders. What is there to hide from? It would be good to be more transparent. I also noticed that the post from peter surrey wasn't replied to or corrected. Is that because the system he is describing and scenario is true:

"This and another heavily promoted marti system uses huge leverage ( 2+ lots per 1K or 200 x leverage)  ) to achieve the stellar results to date. Marti systems always come at a cost, and this one carries the risk that any increased volatility around the trading time could leave you seriously out of pocket. The other thing to note is that because so many trades are closed together ( 33 positions in one October trade)  any slippage will seriously impact results during low liquidity Asian sessions.."

$600 does seem a bit steep for this kind of system.
Verified FX Megadroid stats: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/theforexbloke/advanced-megadroid-setup/1932741

Work hard from the ground up. I make money from trading however it hasn't always been that way. I lost before I started "winning".<br><br>I made and make my money from my business which is casino hire ie hiring out casino tables in and around Nottingham UK. To see what I do go to: http://www.winwincasinohire.co.uk

Offline CanadianPsycho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 523
  • Free markets are sexy
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #27 on: January 11, 2017, 08:26:29 AM »
Alarm bells started ringing for me when I saw tulipfx hiding their open orders. What is there to hide from? It would be good to be more transparent. I also noticed that the post from peter surrey wasn't replied to or corrected. Is that because the system he is describing and scenario is true:

"This and another heavily promoted marti system uses huge leverage ( 2+ lots per 1K or 200 x leverage)  ) to achieve the stellar results to date. Marti systems always come at a cost, and this one carries the risk that any increased volatility around the trading time could leave you seriously out of pocket. The other thing to note is that because so many trades are closed together ( 33 positions in one October trade)  any slippage will seriously impact results during low liquidity Asian sessions.."

$600 does seem a bit steep for this kind of system.

Not a martingale system, but a grid trader with increasing lot sizes. High leverage is required to open multiple orders. The EA has no stop loss in its logic as it simply tries to play volatility and end with a basket of trades in overall profit. This will statistically blow an account at some point. Whether it's years away or tomorrow is anyone's guess. The vendor recommends running this EA on its own account from which a trader makes regular withdrawals implying that a trader should be prepared for a black swan, account blowing event.

Of course slippage could affect results on any broker. I'm not sure why people expect EAs to mirror results across customer and vendor accounts, as there are so many variables that affect entries and exits that this never ever happens. Even if you subscribe to a signal service, your results will be different than the signal supplier's results because of all those variables.

Tulip isn't the only vendor to hide open orders. Most vendors do this because they don't want people copying their trades. I don't think it's be realistic for people to actually try to do that, but I don't think this behaviour should set off alarm bells. It's ridiculously commonplace.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2017, 08:41:24 AM by CanadianPsycho »

Offline Ruairi OPleurisy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #28 on: January 11, 2017, 04:58:16 PM »
$600?

I think I paid $1000 for Tulip's Kangaroo - that unfortunately was not money well spent as it did not work out and I lost money from my account as well as on the upfront cost.  Sounds like I can run it again if I would like to but the urge has not returned to do so!

This Rocket yoke does look like it opens multiple trades alright with some big baskets.

I'll keep an open mind and have a look at alaali and mcbain2009's results to see how they get on.  Fair play for stumping up the $600 if that's how much it costs.

Offline alaali

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 19
Re: TulipFX is back!
« Reply #29 on: January 11, 2017, 05:07:17 PM »
The plan is to withdraw the initial investment as soon as possible (3000+600) and then use the profit to run


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

* Recent Posts

Re: FxMath Harmonic Patterns Signals By Email by FxMath
[Yesterday at 08:12:44 PM]


Re: Easy Forex (ezefx.com) by El_KaPpa
[Yesterday at 07:52:41 PM]


Re: Dux Forex by dutchie
[Yesterday at 07:49:50 PM]


Re: Easy Forex (ezefx.com) by 999cjb
[Yesterday at 06:00:36 PM]


Re: FOREX - An Easy Way To Lose Money by equityfx
[Yesterday at 03:50:39 PM]


Re: Who is making money in Forex? by equityfx
[Yesterday at 03:47:15 PM]


Re: Easy Forex (ezefx.com) by El_KaPpa
[Yesterday at 02:51:19 PM]


Re: CabEX by PhiBase by WiZARD
[Yesterday at 02:33:52 PM]


Re: FourLeafClover EA from FourLeafClover FX by Ruairi OPleurisy
[Yesterday at 02:22:38 PM]


Re: Easy Forex (ezefx.com) by Ruairi OPleurisy
[Yesterday at 02:04:54 PM]